MEGYN KELLY (host): We also have a developing story in Detroit where GM has reached a tentative new labor deal with the United Auto Workers, according to reports. The Associated Press reporting that the four-year contract includes higher entry-level pay, a sweeter profit-sharing plan for the union workers, and a $5,000 signing bonus. Some analysts say that is good news, since the union was reportedly hoping to land bonuses of up to 10,000 a worker. Stu Varney is with the Fox Business network and the host of Varney & Company. The signing bonus goes to people who already have jobs, who are already working there? VARNEY: The signing bonus goes to $5,000 each to 48,500 regular workers at General Motors. Everybody who works at GM, everybody on the line gets $5,000. KELLY: Why do you get a signing bonus if you already have the job there? Isn't a signing bonus used to lure someone into the job? VARNEY: Yes, good point. Let me give you some context here. The taxpayer -- that is, the government -- owns 26 percent of General Motors, 500 million shares. The government, therefore, has a very heavy influence on these contract negotiations. And what they've come up with is basically, in my opinion, a sweetheart deal for the unions. As you enumerated there, Megyn, it's a four-year deal, $5,000 to every single worker. No worker will pay a dime extra for health care coverage. That's different from the rest of America. There'll be new hires, there'll be more profit-sharing, and that $56 per hour for regular workers will be maintained. Now, this is as the economy goes on the brink of recession. Car sales are weak. I believe that this is a sweetheart deal for the unions and that, essentially, this is a politicized contract agreement because the president, the administration want to favor the unions and want to be seen to be doing precisely that. KELLY: Well, they did cut them down from $10,000 signing bonuses to $5,000 signing bonuses, Stu. But you know, I don't understand, because normally a signing bonus -- you can argue about whether they should get pay races and all. But a signing bonus, normally it's to lure somebody into the job or to prevent them from quitting. I mean, in this economy was there a realistic possibility that these thousands of union members were going to quit and go someplace else and they needed that five grand to keep them on board? VARNEY: No. Absolutely out of the question. That $5,000 is not to keep them on board. That is a nice sweet deal demanded by the unions. Remember, the unions are beholden to the administration. The administration is beholden to the unions. They want a relationship that really works. And a $5,000 signing bonus, more new hires of union workers, extra profit-sharing, no increase in health care costs to the worker -- that's a very sweet deal. [Fox News, America Live, 9/19/11]